Macclesfield MP David Rutley reveals intention to stand in next General Election
By Alex Greensmith
2nd Jan 2023 | Local News
Despite being over a-year-and-a-half away, politicians across the country are being asked about whether they are going to stand to be an MP.
MPs from the major parties had to make a decision by the end of December as to whether they would be standing in the next General Election.
The election is likely to be in the summer of 2024 if following previous election date trends, and held no later than January 2025, but no date has been confirmed of yet.
It could be sooner, should Rishi Sunak feel the need to take Britain to the polls.
Macclesfield MP David Rutley has responded to Macclesfield Nub News' requests to whether he will stand again.
In a statement responding he said: "Just to confirm that I will be standing at the next General Election."
This means the Conservative who has represented Macclesfield in Westminster since 2010, will be standing in his fifth General Election to become Macclesfield's MP.
In the 2019 General Election, the 61-year-old ranked first of all candidates with 28,292 votes out of Macclesfield's electorate of 76,216.
The long-serving Macclesfield MP has been Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Americas and Caribbean since October 2022.
Before his 13-year stint in Parliament began, Rutley was a businessman and advisor.
He also stood in the 1997 General Election for St Albans, Hertfordshire, but was not elected.
This means that the UK's next General Election will be Rutley's sixth run for Westminster.
Browse the best Macclesfield jobs on our Jobs section.
Macclesfield: Have you signed up for our FREE Friday weekly newsletter? It contains each week's top five Macclesfield news stories, and one EXCLUSIVE article?
Simply enter your email address on this link.
Free from pop-up ads, or unwanted surveys, Macclesfield Nub News is a quality online newspaper for our town.
New macclesfield Jobs Section Launched!!
Vacancies updated hourly!!
Click here: macclesfield jobs
Share: